Free Database Audit: comprehensive health report for your database

Learn More

Sound familiar?

  • MergeTree compaction storms on a busy ReplacingMergeTree table — final-modifier SELECTs are slow, you considered switching to CollapsingMergeTree but changing the write pipeline isn't free, and you need a real recommendation.
  • ClickHouse Cloud quote just landed and the per-second-billing math doesn't obviously beat your reserved-instance EC2 spend — you need an honest TCO model, not the vendor's.
  • Sharding-key decision looming on a new fact table — picking wrong creates a full data rewrite later, and you want a second pair of eyes on the proposal before committing.

JusDB ClickHouse consultants give you written, sized, defensible decisions from production deployments. Book an architecture review →

Strategic advisory — not execution

ClickHouse Consulting Services

MergeTree-family selection, projection and MV strategy, ClickHouse Keeper topology, sharding decisions, and the Cloud-vs-self-managed economics — delivered as written decision documents. See the ClickHouse hub for the broader services overview.

What our ClickHouse consulting covers

Each deliverable is a written decision document, sized topology proposal, or costed trade-off analysis.

MergeTree Family Selection
MergeTree vs ReplicatedMergeTree vs Replacing/Collapsing/Summing/AggregatingMergeTree — chosen based on your write semantics (append, upsert, fact-update) and read pattern.
Projection vs MV Strategy
Where projections fit (same-table ad-hoc acceleration) vs where materialized views fit (fan-out to differently-shaped targets) — mapped from your slow-query log.
Sharding & Replication
Sharding-key selection (the irreversible decision), Distributed-over-Replicated layout, replica placement across racks/AZs, and the sharding-vs-projection trade-off.
Cloud vs Self-Managed
ClickHouse Cloud vs self-managed-on-K8s-or-EC2 economics, with per-second-billing vs reserved-instance modeling against your actual concurrency and growth.
Keeper & Coordination
ClickHouse Keeper vs ZooKeeper decision for new deployments, sizing for replication-task QPS, and the migration story for existing ZooKeeper fleets.
Ingestion Architecture
Kafka engine, S3 engine, RabbitMQ engine, native HTTP, Flink connector, Vector — chosen by freshness SLA, exactly-once requirements, and existing data infrastructure.
TTL & Storage Tiering
TTL-move-to-disk, S3 cold tier, JBOD volume strategy, and the operational rules for keeping hot working-set on NVMe while archiving cold partitions to object storage.

How a ClickHouse consulting engagement is shaped

1–2 weeks
Architecture Review
Deliverable
Topology recommendation, current-state risk register, MergeTree-variant audit, projection/MV sanity check, sized remediation roadmap.
When to pick this
Running ClickHouse already and want a second-opinion audit before scaling or signing a Cloud commitment.
1 week
Engine Decision
Deliverable
ClickHouse vs StarRocks vs Druid vs Pinot decision matrix with TCO model and per-engine risk profile.
When to pick this
Before committing to a real-time OLAP engine — head off the migration cost of choosing wrong.
1 week
Migration Strategy
Deliverable
Risk-graded migration plan — Snowflake → ClickHouse, PostgreSQL → ClickHouse, or self-managed → Cloud — with cutover sequence and rollback gates.
When to pick this
Before committing to any operationally significant ClickHouse migration.
2–3 weeks
Greenfield Design
Deliverable
Topology spec, capacity model, sharding-key decision, MergeTree-variant layout, ingestion pipeline design, security baseline, ops runbook outline.
When to pick this
New ClickHouse deployment from scratch and you want production patterns from day one.

MergeTree-variant matrix — when each one fits

Rough decision shape before a real engagement. Actual recommendation depends on your workload.

EngineFits whenAvoid when
ReplicatedMergeTreeAppend-only events, log analytics, immutable historical data — the production default.You need upserts — pick ReplacingMergeTree or CollapsingMergeTree.
ReplacingMergeTreeIdempotent upserts where eventual dedup is acceptable; final-modifier SELECT pays the cost.Need strong real-time dedup — final SELECT cost grows with table size.
CollapsingMergeTreeFact-table updates with explicit sign columns; your pipeline can emit corrections.Source can't produce sign rows — ReplacingMergeTree is simpler.
SummingMergeTreePre-aggregated counters where rows merge by sum; saves both storage and query cost.Need raw rows back — aggregation is destructive.
AggregatingMergeTreeStateful aggregations (uniqState, quantilesState) feeding materialized views.Simple sums — SummingMergeTree is lighter.

ClickHouse consulting — common questions

Ready to make the call on ClickHouse?

Book a 30-minute scoping call. We'll tell you which engagement shape fits and what the deliverable will look like — before you commit to a statement of work.