Considering CockroachDB?
- ▸ Multi-region active-active requirement just landed — regulator or DR architecture wants true active-active writes across regions, and single-primary Postgres with logical replication doesn't cleanly answer it.
- ▸ CockroachDB Cloud quote came in 3x expected — team needs an honest TCO model for steady-state usage against self-managed and against alternatives (TiDB, YugabyteDB, Aurora Postgres).
- ▸ "Drop-in Postgres replacement" claim needs validation — you need someone to surface which Postgres features actually transfer and which ones break in production.
JusDB CockroachDB specialists design, migrate, and operate distributed-SQL workloads. See CockroachDB consulting →
CockroachDB Platform Services
Multi-region active-active tables, Raft replication per key range, serializable isolation by default, and PostgreSQL wire-protocol compatibility — distributed SQL designed by ex-Google engineers around the Spanner architecture.
CockroachDB service paths
CockroachDB Consulting
Multi-region table design, Postgres-vs-CockroachDB decisions, MOLT migration planning, CockroachDB Cloud Serverless vs Dedicated sizing — written architecture documents, not Slack opinions.
PostgreSQL vs CockroachDB
Side-by-side comparison — wire-protocol compatibility, horizontal scale, multi-region active-active, serializable isolation cost, when distributed SQL pays off vs single-primary Postgres.
What we build with CockroachDB
From cluster design to multi-region cutover — end-to-end CockroachDB expertise.