PostgreSQL Consulting
Architecture review, operational health checks, technical decisions, and prioritised roadmaps.
Review this service
PostgreSQLChoose the Right
PostgreSQL Service
In short: This PostgreSQL services hub helps teams choose between architecture consulting, performance tuning, migration, high availability, incident support, remote DBA, security, Kubernetes, and cloud-platform work. Each specialist page explains the problem it owns, the engagement boundary, and the evidence needed before scope, timing, targets, or outcomes are agreed.
Start with the decision or operational problem you need to solve. A scoped discovery step then confirms the workload, constraints, deliverables, ownership, and validation method.
Scoped
Responsibilities
Measured
Validation criteria
Documented
Handover artifacts
ILLUSTRATIVE TELEMETRYPostgreSQL 16 · streaming repl
Patroni leader + 2 replicas
Commits / sec
0.00k
Cache hit ratio
99.0%
Replication lag
0ms
CPU
2%
0.00k TPS
[OK] autovacuum: orders processed, 0 bloat detected
[INF] streaming repl: WAL in sync, lag 0ms on node-02
[OK] pg_stat_statements: top query 2.1ms mean
[INF] pg_repack: orders_idx rebuilt with brief lock windows
Representative cluster view · illustrative metrics
Illustrative interface only—not a customer environment or live production telemetry.
Services
PostgreSQL 14 reaches end of life in November 2026. PostgreSQL 13 and earlier are already outside community support; upgrade scope depends on application, extension, and platform compatibility.
Find the Service That
Owns Your Problem
Choose one focused path instead of treating every PostgreSQL problem as generic consulting. Related work can be combined after the primary objective and ownership boundaries are clear.
Performance Tuning
Query-plan, index, configuration, resource, and application analysis against a measured baseline.
Review this service
Migration Services
Cross-engine conversion and PostgreSQL version upgrades with rehearsed cutover and validation plans.
Review this service
PostgreSQL Support
Contract-defined incident response, escalation, and operational coverage for agreed systems.
Review this service
High Availability
Failure-mode analysis, recovery objectives, Patroni architecture, and failover and restore testing.
Review this service
Remote DBA
Continuing PostgreSQL administration, maintenance, capacity planning, and delivery support.
Review this service
PostgreSQL on Aurora
Aurora-specific architecture, compatibility, scaling, resilience, and day-two operations.
Review this service
PostgreSQL on RDS
RDS Multi-AZ, deployment changes, read replicas, parameter groups, and operational constraints.
Review this service
Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL
Google Cloud SQL availability, replicas, IAM integration, migration, and operational limits.
Review this service
Azure PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Azure-specific availability, compute, migration, identity, and operational decisions.
Review this service
Cloud Migration
Provider-neutral readiness, target selection, data movement, cutover gates, rollback, and validation.
Review this service
PostgreSQL on Kubernetes
Operator selection, backup and recovery, upgrades, resilience, and lifecycle trade-offs.
Review this service
Security Audit
Independent technical control assessment, evidence review, and remediation roadmap.
Review this service
Three Ways to Structure the Work
Commercial terms, timing, service windows, and response targets are confirmed only after scope and operating constraints are understood.
Assess and advise
Architecture or Health Check
A scoped review that records the current state, evidence, constraints, risks, decisions, and prioritised next steps.
Systems, evidence, and access agreed first
Findings separated from assumptions
Priorities and decision trade-offs recorded
Implementation and validation plan handed over
Deliver a change
Focused Project
A defined implementation such as tuning, migration, HA, security remediation, or a platform change, scoped after discovery.
Deliverables and responsibilities documented
Change control and dependencies identified
Validation and rollback criteria agreed
Handover records included in the scope
Operate continuously
Support or Remote DBA
Continuing coverage with systems, responsibilities, escalation paths, service windows, targets, and exclusions defined in the agreement.
Choose incident coverage or operational capacity
Named ownership and escalation boundaries
Response targets measured by the signed plan
Recurring reporting and review cadence agreed
Not sure which model fits? Share the problem and operating context.
PostgreSQL Service Questions
Clear boundaries for choosing the appropriate specialist page and engagement.
Which PostgreSQL service do I need?
Choose consulting for an architecture decision or health check, performance tuning for a measured database slowdown, migration for a version or engine move, high availability for resilience design, support for incident coverage, and remote DBA for continuing operational capacity.
What is the difference between PostgreSQL consulting and performance tuning?
Consulting owns broad architecture assessment, technical decisions, risk prioritisation, and an implementation roadmap. Performance tuning is a focused engagement that investigates query plans, indexes, configuration, resource use, and application behaviour against a measured baseline.
What is the difference between PostgreSQL support and remote DBA?
Support provides contract-defined incident and escalation coverage for agreed systems. Remote DBA provides continuing operational capacity for administration, maintenance, planning, and delivery. Coverage, ownership boundaries, response targets, and exclusions are documented before work starts.
Which PostgreSQL versions and platforms can be assessed?
JusDB works with community-supported PostgreSQL 14 through 18 and can assess upgrade paths for older releases. Services also cover self-managed deployments, Amazon RDS and Aurora PostgreSQL, Google Cloud SQL, Azure Database for PostgreSQL, and Kubernetes.
How are scope, timing, and outcomes agreed?
Scope follows discovery of the workload, topology, access, security requirements, change controls, and desired deliverables. The written engagement plan then defines responsibilities, timing, validation criteria, response targets where applicable, assumptions, and exclusions.
Start with the PostgreSQL
Problem You Need to Solve
Share the workload context, current risk, desired decision, and operating constraints. The first step is to identify the right specialist scope—not to promise an outcome before the evidence is reviewed.
Scope first
Access and evidence agreed
Change safe
Validation and rollback defined
Clear handover
Decisions and runbooks recorded
Explore Our PostgreSQL Services
Comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions tailored to your enterprise database needs
PostgreSQL Consulting
Architecture reviews, operational health checks, technical decisions, and prioritised roadmaps
Learn morePostgreSQL Support
Contract-defined incident response, escalation, recurring checks, and service reporting
Learn morePostgreSQL Remote DBA
Embedded DBA capacity for recurring administration, backlog delivery, and context handover
Learn morePostgreSQL Migration
Migration planning and delivery for Oracle, MySQL, SQL Server, and PostgreSQL upgrades
Learn morePostgreSQL High Availability
Patroni, streaming replication, and automated failover architecture
Learn morePostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Query analysis, index design, configuration review, and workload investigation
Learn morePostgreSQL Cloud Migration
AWS RDS, Aurora, GCP, and Azure migration planning and architecture review
Learn morePostgreSQL on Kubernetes
Kubernetes deployment design using PostgreSQL operators and StatefulSets
Learn moreTimescaleDB Consulting
PostgreSQL-native time-series architecture for telemetry, metrics, and analytical workloads
Learn moreTechnical source and review method
PostgreSQL information, checked against primary documentation
JusDB reviews technology-specific claims against the vendor or project's official documentation. Performance examples without a linked case study are labeled illustrative; actual results depend on workload, data model, version, topology, infrastructure, and test method.
Technically reviewed by the JusDB Database Reliability Engineering team on .